> On 2 Mar 2016, at 5:06 PM, J. Landman Gay <[email protected]> wrote: > > Two hypotheticals: > > 1. I create a viewer app to display my original artwork as part of my > job-seeking resume. The viewer seems useful so I decide to distribute it to > others so they can make their own resumes. I include at least some of my > artwork in the distribution so that potential users can see how the app > works, but I don't want them to use my artwork in their own resumes. I decide > to license my artwork restrictively, but the viewer app is GPL. I would think > separate licensing in that case would be okay. The app doesn't depend on my > particular artwork, it only needs something to display. (I know I could > include media that is public domain instead, but that's not the point.) > > 2. I create an app that teaches the history of medieval art. The artwork is > mostly public domain, but some of the illustrations, maps, whatever are my > own creations. The stack doesn't work without the media, and the text in the > app describes it. In that case I need to license everything as GPL because > the app isn't functional without the supporting files. > > Yes?
I think wiser heads than mine need to answer this for 1. Cheers Monte _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
