Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
> Richard wrote:
> That doesn't seem as much a documentation error as a Standalone
> Builder bug. Have you reported it?
>
> This seems to "elementary" that I could not imagine the team would
> not see this before release.
There are some regressions that mystify me too.
> So I assumed it was by design.
Sometimes design decisions merit reconsideration (see File -> New Stack).
> Plus I was recently scolded off list for reporting bugs that were
> actually my ignorance. (even though in fact 75% of my reports are
> legit bugs) So now I'm a bit gun shy about reporting bugs until I
> flog it to death on this list first.
Perhaps it's the tone during the flogging that the team found tiresome.
Yours aren't nearly as bad as some of the stuff I see here and in the
forums, where it's as though the Internet somehow precludes basic good
manners, writing with a tone that appears to presume the team is either
stupid, lazy, or both. It's exhausting to read such things, and more
than a bit demotivating.
Courteous results-focused professionalism goes a long way.
I've submitted a few bugs which were later explained as unnecessary, but
since I try to be respectful when communicating they return the favor.
Good manners are the lubricant of teamwork.
> I assume you feel that we should be able add stack files on mobile…
> so, I will report it.
I see no reason why it should be prevented. If there is a reason
they'll close it with an explanation. If there's any heat feel free to
mention that report was my suggestion.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
