Matt Maier wrote:
> I was reading about "crash only" programming a while ago. It like
> using the "turn it off and back on again"approach as a part of normal
> business. Since all of your systems need to be able to recover from a
> crash anyway, why bother programming a graceful shutdown? Just set
> them up so that they can pick up where they left off and crash them
> if anything isn't running perfectly.
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-livecode/2016-July/228647.html
:)
I like the simplicity of crash-only. But I currently enjoy a
below-industry-average support cost; I can't imagine how big of a
multiple of that average my support costs would be if I rebooted the
user's machine instead of providing a more graceful degradation.
Still, tempting....
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
