Never mind. I just created a test stack in 8.1.1 where the calling
handler always received 'false' from the 'doIt' command.
I tried making 'doIt' return:
false
"false"
(x = 0) -- after adding 1 to x
They all worked!
Maybe something else is interfering with your outcomes?
Phil
On 10/26/16 12:57 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
What happens if you return "false" instead of false? Still broken?
Phil Davis
On 10/26/16 12:45 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I'm using version 8.1.1 (I don't distribute apps compiled with a dev
preview). I return false and immediately in the calling script check
for the result. It is empty.
Bob S
On Oct 26, 2016, at 11:44 , Richard Gaskin
<[email protected]> wrote:
dunbarx wrote:
Do you mean something like this does not work anymore???
Impossible.
on mouseUp
doThis
answer the result
end mouseUp
on doThis
return random(999)
end doThis
Works here as of v9.0 dp 1.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
[email protected] http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
--
Phil Davis
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
