J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 12/13/16 9:43 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> If a binary stack can be used from memory only, it should not be >> necessary to write a script-only stack to disk. >> >> Such a requirement prevents us from using script-only stacks in >> secure zero-footprint apps, such as those with the >> securityPermissions for "disk" turned off. >> >> If you haven't filed a bug report I cam do that. > > If you have time I'd appreciate it. I've submitted a few reports > lately and the time it takes to test and set up a test stack is > not insignificant. I'm also not sure yet whether the issue is > related to my stack setup or if it's universal everywhere so > that would need testing too. Right now I'm in a crunch, so if > you feel like checking it out that'd be great.
I depend heavily on streaming apps and would like to move some parts to script-only stacks, so this is important to me.
While setting up a test scenario I discovered a much simpler recipe, included in the report I just filed:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18998 -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ____________________________________________________________________ ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
