We are working our new mobile app in git hub. The challenge is that we need to 
use N number of binary files as "views" and at least one loader stack to run 
the build. Even though we have zero code in the stack script and zero code in 
the card script (the app is initialized with a behavior for the card… so that 
we use and external .livecodescript library… 

this is working pretty well, where different developers are the designated SOA 
fo any given module/some.livecode # binary stack  so for example in source we 
many have modules/color-meditation.livecode  and every one know that I am the 
SOA and they never touch it. so updates and merging are painless.

BUT  the main top level loader stack  is getting changes  where dev A will add 
a few more stack files, Dev B doesn’t have any iOS devices, so he turns off 
"unchecks" the iOS in the standalone builder and LC of course wants to save and 
the hash changes…ergo Git says the file was modified.  

Currently were looking at ways to externalize the stack file also to a text 
file in source that can be managed more easily by git and then loader stack 
reads it… so the loader stack will not have anyone fiddling directly with the 
stack files in the LC IDE for that stack… *but*  still there is the issue of 
changes to the standalone builder… i.e. that's the back story… 

So if I have to pull a copy of that stack and I have an iOS device , then I 
check that in the standalone builder and save… *now* I get the "missing ARM"  
error messages.. but when I run it a second time, it goes through. 

So maybe (just maybe) the recipe is that the standalone builder's global props 
are not being updated when the user make changes in the standalone build GUI 
panel until *after* the first attempt to build runs… *then* that process 
updates something in the SA build profile, which is saved… and so now when you 
run the build, it goes through… at least that's how it feels at the moment.

BR

 

On 12/12/16, 9:10 AM, "use-livecode on behalf of Mike Kerner" 
<use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of mikeker...@roadrunner.com> 
wrote:

    There is a bug report related to something similar, but I don't know if any
    of us have developed a reliable recipe, yet.  For me it's surprising and
    almost random when it happens, and I don't uncheck/check

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to