If intersect looks for existence rather than appearance why does it tale
transparency levels into consideration?
R.
On 7/14/17 7:19 pm, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
I'm not sure why the explanation would be difficult. Existence is
different from appearance. Intersect looks for existence at a
particular location, visibility is how the object looks.
Substitute "blue" for "visible" and it's the same thing.
On July 14, 2017 5:03:09 AM Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
It does seem illogical that while one can set levels of transparency
with interset
an image can continue intersecting with another when it is, supposedly,
invisible . . .
Certainly, having to explain THAT to children is going to make them take
an even
more dim view of adults than I hope they do already.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
