If only I were sure that all our tooling would be happy with 'dv' - that might make a good name for nightly builds.
Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Jul 2017, at 21:18, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I honestly don't know what the fuss is: > > DP or RC, who cares, after all as long as they are numbered reasonably > sequentially we know > that they are leading up to a 'Full' release (which, after all, means the > start of another SDLC). > > I'm working with 8.1.4 at the moment and having lots of fun with the 8.1.6 > DVs (dirty versions). > > Richmond. > >> On 7/20/17 10:09 pm, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: >>> On 07/20/2017 11:41 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >>> >>> ...the more people we can get using DP's (in particular), the higher >>> quality they will be and the faster new versions will appear. >> >> ...so when was the last time you saw a dp release? >> (of anything other than LC9, which is nothing but, since it hasn't yet >> reached a state stable enough for an rc release) >> >> Seems to be LC8.1.0dp3 from 29 July 2016 >> LC8.1 went through 3 dp releases before getting to RC state >> >> Last one before that was LC8.0.0dp16 17 march 2016 >> 16 dp releases before stabilizing >> >> and before that was LC7.0.0dp10 18 August 2014 >> >> DP releases are pretty rare. People can't try these unless they're released. >> > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
