Odd. I wouldn't have guessed the dependence on "in time" for the send command. Bill P
William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org > On Aug 23, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > >> On 08/23/2017 07:59 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: >> Whaaaa??? So send would but dispatch won't? >> Bob S >>> On Aug 23, 2017, at 06:21 , Trevor DeVore via use-livecode >>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm in the habit of using "dispatch" as it mimics how the engine works and >>> won't throw an error if a message isn't handled. > > Right. > Dispatch will return an "unhandled" status if it can't be executed, while > send will throw an error. > > -- > Mark Wieder > ahsoftw...@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode