> On Apr 27, 2018, at 13:39 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Bob Sneidar wrote:
> 
>> Not to beat a severely wounded horse, but one reason for implementing
>> a detailed file function (and probably why it hasn't been tackled) is
>> that getting the detailed file information from a command shell is
>> decidedly  NOT straightforward.
> 
> Shell is great for things we can't do in LiveCode Script yet may not warrant 
> writing special C-based API interfaces for in LC Builder.
> 
> But in addition to the complexity of attempting to rely on such interprocess 
> communication across platforms, it also carries a certain impact on memory 
> and performance.
> 
> "Why run one process when you can run two at twice the price!" :)

<snip> Thanks Richard. I went ahead earlier and implemented the detailed files 
method and then filtered by filename & *. Works great. I have functions that 
takes the last modified seconds and converts it to an SQL datetime format. Now 
I can look at the filename (no matter what the path to the file appears to be 
to the end user's app) along with the last mod datetime. If those two are 
identical it is the same file, albeit possibly another copy, which doesn't 
matter to me. 

I'm attempting to build into my app a files system with versioning and custom 
user/group permissions in anticipation of a workflow based interface. That will 
take the Forms Generator to a whole new level! Wheee!

Bob S


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to