Hi James, > I would like to hear the advice of members of this list on what the > preferred card size is for viewing on screen. I have been using 640 x > 480 as the standard but this seems to waste a lot of real estate on the > monitor. I would like to move to a larger size but does this mean > that I > will be eliminating many potential users of the stacks that I develop? > Any assistance with this problem would be appreciated. > > Jim Wall
we decided to have 1024*768 as our min. system-requirement. We are living in 2002 ! You can buy 2 Ghz CPU's and a 23" monitor (if the money is available ;-), so one really has to draw a line somewhere. And if someone's idea of "multimedia" is a 486 (or Mac LC etc...) with 32 MB RAM and maybe a 8 bit, 14" monitor, well, ehmm, sorry ma'am... 5 years ago we de3cided to make 800*600 our min. sys-req. But the times they are a changing, and so must standards/sys-req. Compatibility is a fine thing. But only to a certain degree !!! C'mon, the "slowest" pc ypu can get nowadays starts at 800 Mhz... Even if we might loose some customers, we decided to make this strict sys-req. BUT if you are developing mostly for schools etc... you really might have to support smaller screen-sizes, since schools do not have the most up-to-date hardware, if at all... Regards Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
