On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 08:28 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
You've made your position on file name extensions clear; but let me ask this: Might it be a good idea to exclude extensions on files one does NOT want the user to open by double-clicking?Are there extensions that, by convention, are never associated? (and not offensive) Maybe one of those could be used. Or some arbitrary extension.
As in:
private_data.rob
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
