On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
Wow!You might be able to tweak out a few more milliseconds. Consider using "for" instead of "with" or making the "with" work harder for you.
63 milliseconds; 206 hits; 390345 characters ...looks like I have a very
fast parser.
This may work OK for a single space character, but you may have problems with white space in general. You may want to look closer at this. You may need to split up some of your multiword "words".It even works well with empty space, it gives me exactly what I needed.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
