Sarah Reichelt wrote:
"And the winner is......."
and jolly well done to Jacque!
HOWEVER, what naive types like me would like to know
are:
1. How did you time these routines ?
For the sake of argument, I hardly had time to take a
gulp of coffee before mine was done: presumably you
don't do timings in gulps, semi-gulps, demi-semi-gulps
and so on.
2. Although it is very clever (I, for one, had a bit
of fun having a try) to write a routine that reverses
a list a few demi-semi-gulps faster than another,
until we are all using super computers to find out the
question for 42 (pace Douglas Adams) I wonder why
those few micro-gulps really might matter ?
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
____________________________________________________________
A Thorn in the flesh is better than a failed Systems Development Life Cycle.
____________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Inbox http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
