David- Saturday, September 13, 2008, 3:41:51 AM, you wrote:
> yes it is doable and not really "hard". So I think we are on the same wave > length. We differ in that I'm complaining about it :) <g> > For beginners - it is counter intuitive (I remember having to ask on list > about it when learning - and takes up space explaining in the > documentation). It takes a lot of lines of code, and messes up otherwise > nice clean data structures with hacks just to get around the fact that you > don't key your keys back in the order you put it in, and it is a very common This gets back to my argument that in that case you want a queue, not an array. Or rather a queue as a particular subclass of array. I'm muchly in favor of adding queues and stacks (there's that word again) as primitive types as peers of arrays. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
