Mark you lost me on this thread somewhere: 2008/9/14 Mark Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We can have both worlds right now. If you need sorted and unsorted keys & > order of entry per dimensional layer or not all you need do is add layer [9] > assuming you will never need layer 9. Sorry what's layer 9? > ">set the sortorder of theDataA to empty -- unsorted, fastest" > > To All this thread, > > Let's assume that there is no sort function for keys added or order of > entry set controls. > > put chars 4000 to 5000 of zigzag into myArray[4]["4000to5000"] > put "4000to5000, " after myArray[9]["sorted"] > put "4000to5000, " after myArray[9]["notSorted"] > put "4000to5000, " after myArray[9]["entryOrder"] -- same as unsorted > put "4000to5000, " after myArray[9]["globalEntryOrder"] -- for the whole > array > > Later you can sort the list of keys in myArray[9]["sorted"] > > You now have a sorted and non sorted index map of all your keys. One by > entry the other by sorting. What's more important is, is that you can keep > track per dimensional layer. OK. I got some learning to do - what can we do now, and what is proposed regarding sorting of arrays? Also what's the difference between: put someValue after myArray [ someKey] and put someValue into myArray [ someKey] The former is new to me. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
