As I read Gruber's article, his main point is that the policy is wrong, not that the pulled app was in contravention of the current agreement. However I do think a pre-approval mechanism would be beneficial.
And please don't apologize for disagreeing with me. If we can't have a reasonable & courteous debate on this list, then I would be very sorry :-) Cheers, Sarah On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Chipp Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry to disagree with you Sarah, but that just is not the case. There > are a number of apps which have been rejected for various reasons with > extremely lame excuses. John Gruber, a very PRO-APPLE guy, has an > interesting write-up on the situation. > > http://daringfireball.net/2008/09/app_store_exclusion > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Sarah Reichelt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you actually read all the info about the relatively few cases where >> this has happened, it becomes clear that the pulled apps really were >> in breach of the iPhone developer agreement. > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution