Scott,
The easy way to do this might be to use a custom property instead of a
function. Get the someProperty[pData1 & cr & pData2] of me. Perhaps
someProperty[pData1][pData2] works too, I haven't tried that yet. Then
again, why don't you simply put the function into a backscript?
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum
We are always looking for new projects! Feel free to contact us to
discuss your custom software project!
On 15 jan 2009, at 20:45, Scott Rossi wrote:
Hi List:
Just curious... Is there any way to construct a function using a name
stored in a variable without resorting to "do"? For example:
on mouseUp
put "hello" into pData1
put "world" into pData2
put "shout" into test
do "answer" && test & "(pData1,pData2)"
end mouseUp
function shout pData1,pData2
return pData1 && pData2
end shout
Can the last line of the mouseUp handler be written without "do"?
I'm not
against using "do", just wondering if there's another option.
Thanks & Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
