Bill Marriott wrote: > > Bernd, > > Actually in my testing on my machines, over about 20 tests, your change > ends > up being slightly slower by about 1%, depending on the images :) ... > It's interesting how the timed duration can change from one execution to > the > next.
I tested about, well 10 times each when concluding that the version I posted was a little faster. When testing again it was slower, as you noticed. So no dice with this version :) Again thank you for this challenge and the code. regards Bernd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inefficient-code-tp24226458p24286092.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
