> The second article kept referring to the product as "Revolution" - > a very bad thing. Let me be my usual blunt self: this product can > not be taken seriously with the name "Revolution"!
I have to say that I've always liked the name "Revolution." It's unique. I always verbally and mentally call the product "Revolution." I search the web for "runrev" because that's the easiest way that returns relevant results, and also use "RunRev" as an abbreviation for the company in writing. I abbreviate the product as "Rev" when writing it down repeatedly, such as in an e-mail. For me, these are simply different variations adapted for different uses; searching for "runrev" or writing about "Rev" doesn't mean I don't like "Revolution." So I don't see anything wrong with using either "Revolution" or "RunRev." Then again, I'm not swayed much by social trends. I just like what I like. If using one term over another increases revenue then so be it. Anyway, congrats Heather and Rev team on the press coverage! Curry _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution