Bonjour André,
Should this design proposal help ?
global Stacks_to_scan,Stack_to_parse,Compteur
on mouseup
get current_eval()
end mouseup
function current_eval
if Stacks_to_parse is "" then
define_thestacks_to_scan_as_one_stack_peer_line
put "1" into Compteur
put line Compteur of Stacks_to_scan into Stack_to_parse
apply your stats_collect_code to stackStack_to_parse there
get next_eval()
else if Compteur < the num of lines in Stacks_to_scan then
add 1 into Compteur
put line Compteur of Stacks_to_scan into Stack_to_parse
apply your stats_collect_code to stackStack_to_parse there
get next_eval()
else
put "" into Stacks_to_scan
put "" into Compteur
exit to top
end if
end current_eval
function next_eval
get current_eval()
end next_eval
Best Regards,
Pierre
Bonjour,
I have an app including about five hundred stacks (main stacks with
substacks); they are physician's clients files.
In order to produce statistics I have a handler which search the
values of several measures in the main stack and one substack of
each clients.
I am using a repeat loop to search the stacks (useful to say that,
as soon as the values are picked up, I "delete" the main stack).
Despite this, my app systematically crashes before completing the
all set of stacks.
In the archives of the list, I found the following :
---------------------------------------
Re: Releasing Memory and Virtual Memory
J. Landman Gay
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:27:28 -0700
BNig wrote:
Derek,
do you import the 100 or so images in a repeat loop?
If so try whether adding a wait 2 milliseconds in the repeat loop
helps.
Or alternatively try to do it in a "send" structure. In my
experience Rev
has problems releasing memory in a repeat loop. When I changed to
a "send to
me in 2 milliseconds" no more problem with memory build-up.
I agree, and I'm pretty sure this must be what's wrong. Rev doesn't
do any garbage collection until a handler ends. The most reliable
way is the "send in <time>" structure.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
-----------------------------------------
But after a lot of unsuccessful trials I am completely lost and seem
unable to think correctly anymore!
including "wait 2 milliseconds" in the repeat loop does not help.
I don"t see how I could avoid the repeat loop ? (how to use a "send
in time" structure ? is it instead of the repeat loop ??)
I tried to proceed one hundred stacks at a time only, but here again
I don"t see how to avoid a repeat loop ?
What am I missing ?
Thanks a lot in advance for any advice
Best regards from Grenoble
André
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : (33) 6 03 95 77 70
www.woooooooords.com
www.sahores-conseil.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
