Richard Gaskin wrote:
Colin Holgate wrote:
Ian, Flash text fields can be set to allow selecting and copying,
swfs can be published in a search engine friendly way, and it's
possible to "deep link" into any part of a Flash application, if
that's important to do.
The lack of those things in a site isn't a consequence of it being
done in Flash.
True, the use of 6-point Nanosquint type there isn't required by
Flash. I've seen a great many other Flash presentations which can
actually be read by the unaided eye. ;)
I would like to know which part of <http://www.hybridworks.jp/> caught
Richmond's attention. There's a lot there, and inevitably any plugin
will be compared to the ubiquitous Flash so it may be useful to
explore strengths and weaknesses of each.
Ugh, I had a horrible day here: never mind, now I can settle down a bit
. . . :)
The way the thing reorganised its sections was rather jazzy.
The animation, and the sound connected together WITHOUT reliance on
Quicktime.
The download links embedde within the thing.
I have been looking at that website on-and-off for about 3 years and
have always thought
that there must be a way to do all that in RunRev; and with the
web-plugin it is getting
nearer, but I am not sure we are all the way there yet.
--------------------------------------------------
The tiny fonts do annoy me no end; especially as the only way I can read
them is set my
monitor resolution down to 640 by 480 which then screws up the colour.
-------------------------------------------------
I posted this because I thought it might be fun to try and duplicate the
site as much as
possible in RunRev as a sort of mental exercise. Unfortunately as I am
"up to here"
with my Sanskrit "Thing" I don't have the time, which is a great shame
as I do
enjoy that sort of thing a lot.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
