And the video player? That wasn't secondary it was primary. The iTouch was not just about music it was about having an iPhone without the phone part. Otherwise there were cheaper iPods that performed the primary function of playing music just as well. The trouble was, it (and the iPhone IMHO) was just to freaking small to watch anything, never mind watch anything WITH someone else.
But this is all my way of seeing the world, and besides me the number of people who agree with me is... <crickets> ok well I'm the only one. :-) I wonder if there are any plans to put a phone in the iPads? LOL! Bob On Jan 29, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Colin Holgate wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > >> Hence my statement that the iPad is what the iTouch SHOULD have been from >> the beginning. But remember back then, it wasn't at all certain if people >> would adopt a touch only interface en masse. > > The Apps part of the iPod Touch was a secondary function, that you could pay > the extra $20 to get. The main function of the iPod Touch was as a music > player, that needed to easily fit into your pocket. > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
