Thanks Bernard, good tips... I am experiencing this delay compared to running the same command in Terminal in OS X... I have also tried changing the idleRate but that doesn't seem to affect "read from process". Perhaps an external is the best solution.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 2:22 AM, Bernard Devlin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Josh Mellicker <j...@dvcreators.net> wrote: >> Things are working, but there is always about a 4 - 5 second latency in the >> "read from process". > Usually this doesn't matter, but in our current >> project it needs to be within a second or less. > > In the situations where I've used "read from process" this latency > would make it a total non-starter. I think there is something unusual > in your circumstances. > > I have just been working on a small module that uses "read from > process", and the same action launched from a command line takes 5 > seconds, as it does if it was run using "read from process". So your > experience of latency is unusual. Maybe it is something to do with > the startup time of the application you are opening as a process? I'm > running on Vista here, but I've used "read from process" on OS X too > with no noticeable delays > > I would try timing the same action using a command line script to see > if there is really a latency with "read from process". > > Bernard > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
