Try this url (http://david.on-rev.com/tests/drag_image.html) - it is an example of a file that the browser and finder handels fine - drag the image onto the desktop and it is downloaded - but there is no way to do it in rev as there is no useful data in the dragdata.
Shall I file it as a bug? On 12 February 2010 22:35, J. Landman Gay <jac...@hyperactivesw.com> wrote: > David Bovill wrote: > >> Thought this used to work? Do earlier versions set the dragdata correctly >> when you drag and drop an image from the browser? >> >> Testing on OSX - but images that you can successfully drag and drop onto >> the >> desktop - but you are unable to get useful data out of the dragdata. I'd >> expect that the dragdata ["files"] would be set to the url of the image - >> but it is empty and the dragdata ["text"] is vaguely related to the url of >> the image in that it often is - but sometimes can be a useless piece of >> javaScript like "javascript:void(0);". The Finder obviously handles the >> dragdata correctly - so is this an OSX bug or? >> > > Which version of Rev? In 4.0, if the image has a link, I get the link URL. > If there is no link, I get the URL to the source image on the server. These > are in the "text" value. The "files" value is empty. > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution