On May 9, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Randall Lee Reetz wrote: > Exactly . And no, I am not confused. I have been more than careful to always > use the word "source" when asking for C "source" output from rev. Source is > text. Un-compiled source text. No confusion here. Try another straw man > attack?
Now i'm confused. You're pleading for Rev to output C source, presumably to comply with Apple's demands, but you also say that Apple isn't dictating what is used as source. If Apple are not dictating what source should be like, why have a C stage? _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
