Ian,

Well said and accurate. 

As regards the Rodeo server load and saving...

Saving Rodeo code from either the Rodeo desktop or iPad IDE will result in 
sending it to the server where it will be rendered into viewable web app pages. 
The On-Rev server is surprising fast.

Best,

Jerry Daniels

Create iPad web apps with Rodeo:
http://rodeoapps.com

On May 13, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Ian Wood <revl...@azurevision.co.uk> wrote:

> Presumably Jerry is asleep at the moment but from what I've read and 
> watched...
> 
> Rodeo is written in Rev and creates *online* HTML webapps, hosted on On-Rev. 
> Xcode is not involved in the end-user's workflow at all*. The 'originally 
> written in' clause is irrelevant because all that ends up being accessed by 
> someone using a Rodeo-created webapp is HTML/CSS/JS.
> 
> Basically, using Rev's strengths in text/file manipulation to generate all 
> the relevant web files from a Rev-like syntax. What I'm not sure of is 
> whether the Rodeo service is set up to generate the web files on-the-fly or 
> to compile them when you finish editing an app. Presumably the second option, 
> or the server load would get a bit heavy.
> 
> Ian
> 
> * Jerry has spoken about a future possibility of advising authors on 
> PhoneGap-style wrapping of webapps for submission to Apple, but again all the 
> code is processed within Webkit and therefore bypasses the restrictive parts 
> of the SDK agreement.
> 
> 
> On 13 May 2010, at 10:55, David Bovill wrote:
> 
>> I'm sort of assuming that Rodeo is an app written in Cocoa Touch/Objective
>> C/Xcode which reads and writes structured data to the web server. You
>> therefore have an authoring app and a web service. The web service is able
>> to customize an Xcode project, and therefore create an app from this data
>> for you, which you then aim to submit to the App store.
>> 
>> Questions:
>> 
>>  - Is this right?
>>  - Is this not simply using web services to do the same thing as any other
>>  framework that automatically generates Objective C for Xcode - and therfore
>>  "could" fall foul of the "originally written" clause on the new license?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to