Mark, et al. What you say here makes sense. We'll take Rodeo announcements elsewhere and greatly curtail tRev announcements to major events that might stimulate meaning technical discussion.
>From a technical perspective, the most interesting aspect of Rodeo for Rev >users is its use of handlers (called "definitions") as the basic building >block of an app...one that can be checked out and locked for a user. Rev users who want to follow this type of discussion and contribute to it, need only let me in an email and we'll add you to our discussion list. Handler centricity in Revolution has always been one of my passions. What we are doing with definitions could be done in Revolution. If I thought there was a market for it, I'd have done it in tRev or a team version thereof. Best, Jerry Daniels jerry.dani...@me.com On May 31, 2010, at 6:31 AM, Mark Schonewille <m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote: > Btw. I have no problem with discussing actual (On-)Rev-based third-party > products on this list. It is much more interesting than mere advertisements > for third-party products and lengthy discussions of SDK license conditions of > indirectly related companies ;-) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
