A more efficient way of doing this would be to group the buttons and
set the backcolor of each button to empty, then just
set the backcolor of group "myBtnGroup" to 89,149,218
and all the objects in the group will inherit the backcolor of the
group (as long as they don't have an individual backcolor set). Note
that for this to have visible effect for buttons, they must be opaque
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
On Jun 20, 2010, at 9:07 AM, René Micout wrote:
I have also this case : no variable but object (button) name :
repeat with i = 1 to 21
put "set the backColor of btn" && quote & "btnHarmo"& i & quote
&& "to" into vxA ; do vxA
end repeat
is array solution possible ?
or it is necessary to do :
set the backColor of btn "btnHarmo1" to 89,149,218
set the backColor of btn "btnHarmo2" to 89,149,218
set the backColor of btn "btnHarmo3" to 89,149,218
...
...
set the backColor of btn "btnHarmo21" to 89,149,218
Le 20 juin 2010 à 13:18, Jim Ault a écrit :
In this case I would use an array
or custom properties. Much faster by far.
--variable array
add one to vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ]
--custom property ( a trickier technique, but more powerful )
get the vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ] of this stack +1
set the vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ] of this stack to IT
--or store on each card
get the vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ] of this CARD +1
set the vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ] of this CARD to IT
---------------------------------------------------------
The array method takes 1 tick to do 10,000 times
put "4" into vpNumFlux
put the ticks into startt
repeat 10000 times
add one to vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ]
end repeat
get the ticks - startt
get IT & cr & vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ]
answer IT -- => 1 yep only one tick
The custom property method takes 14 ticks to do
put "4" into vpNumFlux
put the ticks into startt
repeat 10000 times
get the vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ] of this stack + 1
set the vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ] of this stack to IT
end repeat
get the ticks - startt
get IT & cr & the vgCpuFlux[ vpNumFlux ] of this stack
answer IT -- => 14 ticks
The 'do' command should not be used for simply adding numbers such
as a cross-tabulation technique like you are employing.
Hope this helps.
On Jun 20, 2010, at 3:38 AM, René Micout wrote:
Thank you Mark,
In my project I use lot of "do" command...
For you, is that (the number of flux (flows) is 5) :
put "add 1 to vgCompteurFlux"& vpNuméroduFlux into vxA ; do vxA
faster or slower than :
switch vpNuméroduFlux
case 1 ; add 1 to vgCompteurFlux1 ; break
case 2 ; add 1 to vgCompteurFlux2 ; break
case 3 ; add 1 to vgCompteurFlux3 ; break
case 4 ; add 1 to vgCompteurFlux4 ; break
case 5 ; add 1 to vgCompteurFlux5 ; break..
end switch
You can answer to me : make a test ;-)... But have you ever had
this choice to make ?
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
