On 28/07/2010 21:59, "Ben Rubinstein" <benr...@cogapp.com> wrote:
> Two reasons why I think this is worth the time: one is just PR. > > The second is to preserve a valued resource. RunRev is not Microsoft. It > cannot employ hundreds of testers in a well equipped config lab. Rev is a > fantastically complex product. There are inevitably masses of issues in Rev. > RunRev cannot hope to find more than some of the ones in the new features that > they are working on. They can keep adding new features, each with new bugs, > and never fix (because never find) more than a few of the old ones; I doubt if > this is a route to massive success. If they wish to do any better than this > at improving the quality of the product, the work of their users in noting, > isolating and reporting problems is absolutely essential. Users will do this > for two reasons: selfish (they want this issue fixed) and unselfish (they've > found a workaround so it doesn't bother them any more, but think it would help > others and the product if it was fixed). Both motives will not survive the > appearance that their efforts are wasted. There will be a completely new approach to bug management introduced at the point that we ship 4.5. We'll elaborate on the details when we introduce it. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/ RunRev - Software construction for everyone _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution