Nevermind, it works fine. Have no clue why I couldn't make it work the first 5 times I tried it.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Mike Bonner <bonnm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Remind me, can you actually check a property of an object while a handler > that sets the property is running? It works fine when setting a variable, > but I can't make it work when repeatedly changing a property in a repeat > loop. (I suspect it would work if it was a send in time that set the > property, correct?) > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:31 AM, J. Landman Gay > <jac...@hyperactivesw.com>wrote: > >> On 9/24/10 8:36 AM, dunb...@aol.com wrote: >> >> Is there a way to "interrupt", or rather, "interrogate", the repeat loop? >>> I >>> am not talking about checking the property within that running code. >>> >> >> I think what you want is: >> >> wait 1 millisecond with messages >> >> Put that into the repeat loop somewhere. It forces the engine to do all >> the same cleanup and checking as it does on idle, and will catch any pending >> messages that have happened. >> >> -- >> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com >> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> use-revolution mailing list >> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
