yes! Runrev, PLEASE FREE THE ON-REV CLIENT and API. What is the big "secret", anyway?
sqb On 3 October 2010 13:55, David Bovill <da...@vaudevillecourt.tv> wrote: > On 3 October 2010 17:40, Michael D Mays <mich...@michaelsmanias.com> > wrote: > > A classic example is the On-Rev client. Locking that thing up in a > standalone was completely pointless. Active members of the community could > have rolled their own versions of a client (ie based on an informal API), > that would have been orders of magnitude better than the current offering. > > It would not have mattered if this API moved fast (it hasn't anyway), nor > would it matter if they withdrew the API / charged for it / locked things > down afterwards (as long as we knew this was a possibility up front). > > We can only hope that this old-school business logic is replaced by a saner > cooperation with developers, a saner use of common technologies to > integrate > the various lists, forums, and bug tracking, and an intelligent use of open > content licensing for some of the IDE components. > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- Stephen Barncard San Francisco Ca. USA more about sqb <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar> _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution