Not according to the documentation. And I didn't start off using the
"with message" form. In fact, I never did get around to even trying
that once I discovered that <I> was the one that was making the mistake
(i.e., trying to read more bytes than were there).
len morgan
On 10/8/2010 1:29 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Oct 8, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Len Morgan wrote:
It still bothers me though that I never got the socketTimeout message
even though that's exactly what was happening.
I have a vague memory of strange things with this.
I wonder if you don't get the message if you don't use 'with message'
in the read. Maybe that info is just in the result.
Dar
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
