On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Richmond wrote:
On 11/16/2010 08:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
I love how unconnected discussions come together! I just
downloaded stackrunner and it seems to solve all my issues
regarding standalone startup banners/using test files versus live
files. I point it to my application .rev file and it runs it as if
it were a standalone, opening the live application database instead
of the test one, but with no banner of any sort. The only downside
is that the OSX menubar item for the aplication says StackRunner
instead of my application's name.
So while I'm a happy camper,
really? I am afraid that at present I feel that RunRev are camping
things up a bit; so who is camper
than whom can be the next direction this discussion takes.
Sounds like we need to establish a scale of camp-ness
this seems to completely circumvent Revoution's plan to strongly
discourage commercial distribution of LiveCode Personal
applications via the startup banner or am I missing something?
Frankly, distributing a stack with a stackrunner as a commercial
package doesn't look that good;
especially as anybody who can get their paws (sweaty or otherwise)
on a copy of RR/LC can merrily
start mucking around with your stack.
Agree with that. That's one of the reasons I've never liked using a
secondary stack file as a solution to the problem of not being able to
store data in a standalone.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
