JB wrote: >Well, I'm not sure... depends on what you mean by >"customizable"... >I'm afraid that too many degrees of freedom in >customisation might lead to totally non-consistent >interfaces. Just consider the incredible number of >ugly webpages on the net, the incredible number of >non-consistent (often impossible to use) interfaces in >websites and online flash movies...
[snip] Actually that message were supposed to go to the MetaCard list. Looks like I have to put apart the direction of every Revolution mail list. (Actually 3 mailing list) >Well, as long as end users only design crap >interface for their own IDE, it's not a too big >problem (although it might affect their productivity >by several orders of magnitude)... >But their choices might extend to apps for clients, >or stuff they put online for others to download... What do you think of the interfaces that Kai Krausse and his team created for their MetaCreations line of softwares? >I have the feeling that switchable (on/off) parts >of the interface (palettes, etc) might be a better >option...AFAIR this option of switchable options has >been already discussed last summer on the MC list... Have someone presented a working model to test? al ===== Visit my site: http://www.geocities.com/capellan2000/ Search the mail list: http://mindlube.com/cgi-bin/search-use-rev.cgi __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution