Re: Converting Hexadecimal in Binary • From: Alejandro Tejada • Subject: Re: Converting Hexadecimal in Binary • Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:28:37 -0800 on Sat Jan 10 Dar Scott wrote:
>You can move toUpper() out of the loop.
snip
on mouseUp
-- put the ticks into zxcv
-- this line put the ticks into a variable to count the time -- that takes to execute this handler. There are 60 ticks in a second
put the imagedata of img 1 into asd delete char 1 of asd -- the first char of the imagedata is the alphadata or maskdata
repeat with i = 1 to length(asd) step 4 get binaryDecode("H*", char i to i+2 of asd, v1) put v1 after fldhex end repeat
put length(fldhex) into lenghtofldhex repeat with i = 1 to lenghtofldhex step 60 -- I want 60 chars per line put return & char i to (i+59) of fldhex after fldhexa2 end repeat
put empty into fldhex put toUpper(fldhexa2) into fld "hex" put ((the ticks - zxcv) / 60) && "seconds to create the hexadecimal data from binary imagedata" end mouseUp
changed to this may make it (a lot) quicker: ### = change on mouseUp
--put the ticks into zxcv ### old HC way :^)
put the millisecs into zap ### if the img is small this shows more exactly the difference
-- this line put the ticks into a variable to count the time
-- that takes to execute this handler. There are 60 ticks in a second
put the imagedata of img "prep" into asd
delete char 1 of asd
-- the first char of the imagedata is the alphadata or maskdata
###
get binaryDecode("H*", asd, v1)
repeat with i = 1 to length(v1) step 8
put char i to i + 5 of v1 after fldhex
end repeat
###
put length(fldhex) into lenghtofldhex
repeat with i = 1 to lenghtofldhex step 60 -- I want 60 chars per line
put return & char i to (i+59) of fldhex after fldhexa2
end repeat
put empty into fldhex
put toUpper(fldhexa2) into fld "text"
--put ((the ticks - zxcv) / 60) && "seconds to create the hexadecimal data from binary imagedata"
###
put the millisecs - zap && "milliseconds to create the hexadecimal data from binary imagedata"
end mouseUp
But still, i feel curious to know WHY binaryencode() could put his results after a variable and binarydecode reports an error. The sintax of both functions is similar so, Where did originates this error?
put binaryDecode("H*", char i to i+2 of asd)after var -- produces an error!
Of coarse it should be : get binarydecode("H*", char i to i+2 of asd,v1) put v1 after var
put binaryEncode("H*", char i to i+2 of asd)after var -- works perfectly!
Thanks again Dar, for your extraordinary help with this task.
al
Greetings, WA
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
