On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 11:12 AM, tuviah snyder wrote:
So I'm for any syntax which would enable me to precompile some functions
(such as math functions, ect) without losing the flexibility in cases where
I may want to dynamically intercept messages like mousemove in a backscript.
Perhaps a tiny first step would be to optimize function binding within the same script.
This might be triggered by a keyword at the function definition.
It also might be done with notation at the call. This would clutter the call but has the advantage in that it would create a compile error if the function is not in the script. Maybe all calls in braces must be resolved as built-in or script local.
Inline might be on this path.
If it wasn't for front scripts this could be a transparent optimization. Or am I not understanding front scripts right?
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
