I use source control and develop/test my Revolution application in different IDEs
(Windows, OS X, Linux, Sun Solaris, AIX). I maintain and application/projects library
directory tree similar to below.
SRC
TRANSCRIPT
COMMON
ALGO
MATH.REV (CONTAINS EXPMOVAVG, SCALE…)
FINANCIAL
INDICATORS.REV (CONTAINS MACD, PTP…)
DATABASE
EARNINGS.REV (CONTAINS INTERFACE TO EARNINGS DB)
HLCV.REV (CONTAINS INTERFACE TO HLCV DB)
ANALYZER
ANALYZER.REV (A APPLICATION)
This type of project/application/library management is common in large development
projects. The constructs of module inclusion provided in Runtime Revolution do not
seem to allow this source management technique. I realized you are quite experienced
in developing products using Runtime Revolution. I may not properly understand the
construct Runtime Revolution provides I would appreciate a education if you have the
time. However, I have seen very few postings from developers involved in large
projects. My application is extremely large and requires reusable interfaces for any
number of applications. I see no simple way if implementing this with the given
constructs.
NOTE: Every popular language C,C++,Visual Basic… has some form of file inclusion by
way of relative paths.
Kevin
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:
Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental.
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)
--- On Wed 04/07, Ken Ray < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Ken Ray [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 11:26:27 -0500
Subject: Re: Relative Paths
Kevin,<br><br>Why do you need to add stacks to the stackFiles property? I've been
using<br>MC/Rev for years and never needed to do this to open other stacks. When
you<br>open a stack in the IDE, it automatically defaults to the path where
the<br>executable lies, and only changes when you set "the directory" (or
the<br>"defaultFolder"). All relative paths are from ther<br>e.<br><br>Does this
help?<br><br>Ken Ray<br>Sons of Thunder Software<br>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>Web
Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/<br><br><br>> From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]><br>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], How to use Revolution<br>> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]><br>> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 04:52:15 -0400 (EDT)<br>> To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]<br>> Subject: Relative Paths<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> I am a bit confused.
How does one create applications that can be used in the<br>> IDE on multiple
platforms without relative paths. When I add a satck file to<br>> the the stackFiles p
roperty (in the property explorer) the fully qualified<br>> path is used. When I
copy the stack to another platform the path (something<br>> like
"/Users/me/src/transcript/common/xxx.rev") will not function. Please<br>> someone
explain how this is supposed to work?<br>> <br>> <br>> Kevin<br>> <br>> <br>>
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>> Disclaimer:<br>> <br>> Any
resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>> employer, my terminal, or the
view out my window are purely<br>> coincidental. <br>> Any resemblance between the
above and my own views is non-deterministic.<br>> <br>> The question of the existence
of views in the absence of anyone to hold<br>> them<br>> is left as an exercise for
the reader. The question of the existence of<br>> the reader<br>> is left as an
exercise for the second god coefficient.<br>> (A discussion of non-orthogonal,
non-integral polytheism is beyond the<br>> scope of this article.)<br>> <br>> <br>>
<br>> _______________
________________________________<br>> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>> The
most personalized portal on the Web!<br>>
_______________________________________________<br>> use-revolution mailing list<br>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>>
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution
mailing list<br>[EMAIL
PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
