I do not necessarily disagree with you, Judy, about the 10-hour limit.
I just don't think we have enough data points yet to know for sure,
that's all.
Dan
On Sep 3, 2004, at 7:43 AM, Judy Perry wrote:
I agree. I don't argue that Rev flood the market with free software
for
educators. I simply do not believe that 10 hours is a sufficient
amount
of time for learning/evaluation and that even the mere *perception*
that
"real developers" get 30 days and lowly newbies get 10 hours looks bad.
Worse than bad: it looks like either the company isn't serious or it
has a
bias against this particular market (something which, incidentally, I
don't believe is true).
Judy
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Dan Shafer wrote:
That sounds like I agree with Judy and Marian. I don't. Because the
difference here is two-fold. First, RunRev doesn't have the resources
to wait four years for college grads to enter the job market with
experience in Revolution. They have to make profits now.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
