This reminds me of a rehash of the the C vs C++ debate on the carbon-list currently. You can technically do anything you can do in C++ with C. I recently
had to work on a VB.NET project and it was a bit different then the VB I remember, was it better, not really, some things were actually more confusing just different. Some VB developers feel abandoned.. I find working in Rev more productive for GUI apps then working in C++, or Java, you get immediate results. Should advancing the language and integrating OOP features be a goal, definitely. It useful for large projects which involve multiple developers, which are not currently Rev forte, but it may be the chicken and egg sort of thing. But I don't see a feature request or a suggested spec for it anywhere... Implementing it however, should not come at expense of implementing features that are some blockers for projects and there is still a lot of design work which needs to be done. From our recent debates on the improve list it seems that people don't want real OO necessarily, but some sort of inheritance and the ability to *reuse controls* or scripts. Parentscripts, or a backscript which distinguishes between objects by properties, should get you most of that. Best, Tuviah ________________________________________________________________ Get your name as your email address. Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution