> At 12:07 PM -0400 9/29/2004, Gregory Lypny wrote: > >In doing some statistical work, it occurred to me that Revolution's > >arrays would be greatly enhanced if we could access sub-arrays just > >like we can with itemized and line-delimited lists. > > I agree it's a good idea. It might be harder than it looks, because > all Rev's arrays are associative arrays (what look like numeric > arrays are actually associative), so I suspect some major reworking > would be needed. > --
another interesting feature would be some sort of "find" function for arrays... for instance : put "myText" into T[5,8] find "myText" in T ----> would return "5,8" or a list of found chunks if it is in more than 1 array cell I know this can be emulated using the "combine" function, and then itemoffset of lineoffset, but it would be more elegant (and probably faster). And I don't think this means a major rewriting... JB _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution