If a command is execute and messageNotHandled handles the message will RR still throw an error?
Example: on mouseUp undefinedHandler "parameter" get undefinedFunction( "parameter" ) end mouseUp In the case the to calls called undefinedXXX do not exist? So if these are passed through messageNotHandled are the considerd handled and do not cause a error? -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Fri 10/29, K < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: K [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:44:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Very strange question? <br><br>I found that message myself but was not very successful with it (didn't spend much time on it). I will make a attempt to explore it further.<br><br>Thanks for the suggestion.<br><br><br>-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>Any resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely<br>coincidental. <br>Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.<br><br> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold<br>them<br>is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of<br>the reader<br> is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. <br>(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the<br>scope of this article.)<br><br><br><br> --- On Fri 10/29, Richard Gaskin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:<br>From: Richard Gaskin [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nrev.com<br>Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:40:19 -0700<br>Subject: Re: Very strange question?<br><br>K wrote:<br>> Is is possible to create a script handlers/functions that will catch all un-caught messages? If so how would this work?<br><br>When the messageMessages global property is set to true, a script can <br>catch two new messages, which are fired for each message sent:<br><br>messageHandled<br>messageNotHandled<br><br>These are not documented, so officially they may be subject to change. <br>But I learned about them by poking around in Rev's unlocked scripts, so <br>if Rev uses 'em their longevity potential seems reasonable.<br><br>-- <br> Richard Gaskin<br> Fourth World Media Corporation<br> ___________________________________________________________<br> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listi nfo/use-revolution<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br> _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
