--- Jan Schenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Erik Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so if these are regular stacks, can't a dogHund > use standalone substacks to rip off RunRev? > In theory, you could use Revolution to produce > a clone > that allows editing of Revolution stacks. > However, > this would be quite a lot of work to achieve > the same > level of user interface. > > But you are not allowed to do so, as stated in > your > license agreement. Here's a post from Kevin > Miller > that I pulled from the archive : > <http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2002-April/004014.html> > > Hope this explains the situation, > > Jan Schenkel. i had NO intention of pulling a fasty. Please. i even have a MetaCard license! i just don't understand how a changeable substack of an unchangeable standalone differs from a regular editable stack. it doesn't really matter. the whole thing is OT. Erik Hansen ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikhansen.org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
