It seems to me a more significant contest between the two systems would be to assign the same project to two very experienced developers with each development environment, and see who gets it finished quicker.
I cannot imagine many situations where productivity is not of great significance. If a person can create a program in half the time of his competitors, he can afford to charge less to his clients, and still make a bigger profit. This is not to say that Real Basic is not a fast development environment - I honestly do not know that much about it one way or the other. I am just saying that this particular contest misses the point for like 99 out of 100 programming situations. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chipp Walters Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:48 PM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: RunRev vs RealBasic (Richard Gaskin) Hi David, A quick Google shows you're the product manager for Real Basic. Guess that sorta slipped your sig ;-) I certainly understand your desire to defend RB to the max. I followed closely the previous RB-RR thread, and don't recall it as you do. Perhaps we should discuss over lunch? (I'm in Austin, too!) -Chipp -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 1/17/2005 _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution