On 4/12/05 2:26 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
You won't even throw in a plug for altPlugins? I mean, how many times has altArchive saved your skin;-)
Sorry, I have to agree with Dan on this one. Regardless of how useful a plugin is, including recommendations for it in a Rev guide is off topic. And it would force Dan to choose some plugins over others, which would necessarily be arbitrary -- there are so many good ones out there. How would he choose which ones to exclude? Best to keep any documentation restricted to the IDE itself.
cw
Dan Shafer wrote:
The "in principle" argument is simple. The unadorned, unenhanced IDE is the common denominator that needs documenting. Third-party tools should be documented by their developers, not in a general-usage IDE document. There are several completely alternate IDEs running around out there. I think the basic need is for documenting what comes with Rev out of the box.
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
-- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
