> I agree. It's now bug 2779, if you are interested in voting for it.
Didn't have to ask twice. I've parted with 5 of my votes for this item, so we'll see how soon it will be before that get's implimented (hopefully soon).
> In thinking about it, I'm thinking of this with another benefit: not > only does it reduce the on-disk size of the stack, but it should also > reduce startup time for the standalone, since there will be less data > to read in from disk.
This would also be a great benefit. I'd love to be able to boast a 1 second load time on Windows 95 (on XP it would explode on the screen).
Derek Bump Dreamscape Software _______________________________________________ Compress Images Easily with JPEGCompress 2.5 http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
