--- Dar Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 1, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote: > > > Ah yes, but then I have to check the result myself > to > > throw an error, and that's what I wanted to avoid > ;-) > > My earlier suggestion is backwards-compatible but > > allows people who like try-throw-catch, to > structure > > their code in a more readable way. > > But your suggestion requires an enhancement (or > maybe some fancy > errorDialog technique). > > I was wondering about what developers can use now. > > Would a property or command for each library to > switch between > thrown/result help? > > Dar >
In that case, this might be an issue for the revInterop workgroup -- they're working on standardizing library names and calls, and storing information about the supported commands, functions, properties, etc. If you're not a member yet, I'm sure they'd like you to join the dicsussion at: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/revinterop/> Jan Schenkel. Quartam - Tools for Revolution <http://www.quartam.com> ===== "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time." (La Rochefoucauld) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution