It seems to me that perhaps this has been taken differently than intended. It is less of a snippy remark than my trying to understand the company's timetable for releases. While I know that these things cannot be expected to be set in stone and rigorously followed, I find myself puzzled by what seems to be fits and spurts in releases.
Originally, we were told to expect more or less one feature release per year and one or more bug-fixes within that same period. Version 1 went to version 2, to 2.2 I think, to 2.3... and things seemingly started slowing up considerably. Getting from 2.5 to 2.6 took more than a year with seeming little in the way of bug-fixes. I am at a point in time in the next week or so where I need to decide whether to seek an update pack for my university's labpack or hopefully get the department to spend that amount of money on something else (like maybe QTPro). I wouldn't really mind so much it being the Rev update pack, but I am troubled that it seems we're not likely to gain anything by it, and at least with QTPro, I could include a Flash animation unit and use QTPro to convert Flash output to something Rev can use. Can anyone make any recommendations or better insights into the company's update/release schedule without giving away the crown jewels ;-) ? Judy On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, MisterX wrote: > > So, we're talking about what, 4 or 6 years? > > > > Judy > > > > ROTFL ;) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
