On 6/9/05 6:23 PM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But to be honest, it's very rare that I use either "call" or "send". > Both are up there with "do" in terms of a modest amount of additional > overhead needed to handle them relative to calls natively in the message > path. On 6/9/05 8:51 PM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What are the relative timings of handlers in the message path vs. handlers >> outside? > > About twice as long, but as with many benchmarks with Transcript it > hardly matters: "twice as long" sounds like a big deal, but on my 1GHz > G4 that's still less than a microsecond. :) Are there stronger reasons for you to use "call" and "send" very rarely? I ask because I've been using "send" a lot. -- Dick _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
