Hi Richard,
Don't think it's a problem of religion :-)
Or you want to maintain an "every day" language or you want to allow
specialists languages come in.
As for me I don't mind : I use both.
But I think that all guys who invented Xtalks principles would not
agree.
In fact, if some distorsions could win over the purists of minimalist
programming, I should not be worried ;-)
But I am a writer too: So I love words... and hate when they are
replaced with simple maths operations.
Some civilization question ?
Best Regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
Le 23 juin 05 à 20:17, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Eric Chatonet wrote:
Hello Richard,
Since it would be optional as it is in other xTalks, nothing
would be lost.
Except the spirit :-)
Grasp all, lose all...
With the current flexibility of xTalk, we can choose to write:
put 1 + tMyVar into tMyVar
..or we can write:
add 1 to tMyVar
Does it necessarily diminish the language to have these options?
I save my religion for Sundays....
----------------------------------------------------------------
So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch
Free plugins and tutorials on my website
----------------------------------------------------------------
Web site http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Phone 33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile 33 (0)6 20 74 50 86
----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
